For QA Engineers
Localization coverage without hiring linguists
Add localization coverage to your QA process without adding linguists. In-context scanning across every locale, with MQM-scored, reproducible findings.
The test nobody owns
Localization testing sits in an awkward gap. It requires language knowledge your QA team does not have, and product knowledge the external linguists do not have. So in most organizations it is either skipped, spot-checked, or assumed to be someone else’s job.
Meanwhile the defects it would catch are indistinguishable from ordinary UI bugs once they reach production, they just take three times as long to diagnose, because the first question is always is this a translation problem or a layout problem.
How Loqalit fits into a QA process
It answers the language question for you. Loqalit evaluates whether the text is correct and whether it renders correctly, so your team does not need to read Japanese to know whether the Japanese build passes.
Findings behave like bug reports. Page, flagged element, severity, suggested fix. Reproducible and routable, not a document requiring interpretation.
Coverage that scales with locale count. Adding a market adds a scan target, not a test-writing project.
Severity that maps to your triage. MQM severity levels translate cleanly onto critical, major, minor triage, so localization defects enter the same prioritization queue as everything else instead of living in a parallel process.
Full-page scanning. Every visible translatable string on a page is extracted and checked in one pass, with code and non-translatable elements ignored.
What it does not replace
Loqalit will not replace a native reviewer for high-stakes creative or legal copy, brand voice and regulatory language still need human judgment. What it replaces is the manual sweep: the hours spent clicking through locales looking for text that does not fit.